SearchDiscoveryMobileGojek · GoFood

Gojek · GoFood · 2020–2021

Redesigning How 20M Users Find Food.

Every day more than 1.2 million GoFood orders are placed using search. With close to half a million merchants on the platform, quickly surfacing relevant results is a fundamental product problem — not just a UX one.

1.2M+

Orders/day via search

500K

Merchants on platform

20M+

Monthly active users

65%+

Bookings start from search

The Opportunity

Search to booking conversion was very low. And search was primitive.

More than 65% of all GoFood bookings were made from search — but the search-to-booking conversion was critically low. Search was built as a name lookup: type a restaurant name, get a list. It couldn't handle dish intent, brand intent, or cuisine exploration.

As the Senior Product Designer on GoFood, I was tasked with rethinking the search experience from the ground up — grounded in data, validated by users, and designed for how people actually think about food.

My Role

Senior Product Designer

End-to-end ownership: research, definition, design, and handoff. Partnered with the search engineering team on relevance model integration.

Market

Indonesia, Vietnam & Thailand

Southeast Asia's largest food delivery service

Research · Quantitative

What does the data actually say?

I collaborated with the business intelligence team to analyse millions of daily queries. We took the top 100 queries and manually tagged them by user intent. Four distinct intent types emerged.

🍜

Dish Intent

Users search for a specific dish name.

"nasi goreng", "sushi", "gado-gado"

🏪

Brand Intent

Users search for a specific multi-outlet brand.

"KFC", "McDonald's", "Fore Coffee"

📍

Restaurant Intent

Users search for a specific restaurant they know.

"Warung Bu Kris", "Sate Senayan"

🌏

Cuisine Intent

Users search for a category or cuisine type.

"Japanese", "healthy", "fast food"

Distribution of search count by intent

Cuisine ┐
Dish
Brand
└ Resto
Key insight

Dish intent dominates search volume — but Brand intent drives a disproportionately higher share of bookings. Brand searchers convert better. They know what they want.

Research · Behaviour Patterns

Why do users search the same thing twice?

We analysed repeat searches — tracking the original query to the final query in a booking session. Three distinct patterns explained most of the re-typing behaviour.

Typo or Different Intent

The final query is completely different from the original, or the original had a typo. The user's first attempt failed to capture what they actually wanted.

Identic

The final search query is exactly the same as the original. Users retry because results didn't satisfy — not because the query was wrong.

Expanded

The final query is an expansion of the original. Users add words to narrow down — a signal they need better filters or smarter suggestions upfront.

Research · Qualitative

7 things users told us in interviews.

In-depth interviews with users in Indonesia and India — a careful mix of age, gender, and order frequency. These were the signal insights that shaped our design direction.

01

Users start with a restaurant first, then look for dishes — not the other way around.

02

Users search for dishes but expect a list of restaurants as results.

03

Brands are associated with trust, quality, and consistency of taste.

04

Search is the primary mode of discovery on GoFood — not browsing.

05

Users know what they don't want before they start searching.

06

Users decide on a cuisine before they start searching.

07

Social media and recommendations from friends heavily influence restaurant selection.

Define

Six focus areas that shaped the redesign.

Based on the qualitative and quantitative data, we defined the scope tightly before moving to design.

01

Help users make a decision at every step

Not just at the results stage — every moment of the search journey should reduce hesitation.

02

Reduce search-to-selection time

The faster a user finds what they want, the more they trust the app. Speed is a design quality.

03

Reduce number of repeat searches

Repeat searches signal failure. Each re-query is a user telling us the previous result wasn't right.

04

Reduce cognitive load on users

Show less, mean more. Every unnecessary result or option is friction.

05

Focus on restaurant funnelling

Users ultimately order from a restaurant. Design the search to move them confidently toward that decision.

06

Reach search results faster

Pre-search should do work for users — surfacing recent, relevant, and contextual options before they type.

Solution

From a name lookup to a discovery surface.

01

Predictive suggestions & intent classification

Before the user finishes typing, the system predicts their intent — dish, brand, restaurant, or cuisine — and shapes the suggestion list accordingly. Dish intent surfaces dishes. Brand intent surfaces brand hubs.

Pre-search
02

Recent restaurant searches, not just queries

Previous versions only remembered query strings. We redesigned recents to show restaurant cards — because users return to places, not words. This dramatically reduced time-to-first-tap for returning users.

Pre-search
03

Spell check, auto-correct, and no more empty states

Zero-result screens were replaced with smart recovery flows. Typos get corrected. When there's no exact match, adjacent results are surfaced automatically — with clear explanation of what was expanded.

During search
04

Restaurant-focused dish results & new brand intent

Dish searches now show a two-layer result: the dish in context of a restaurant, with the menu item visible. Brand intent results show a dedicated brand hub — logo, all outlets, top dishes — not just a restaurant list.

Results
05

Improved information hierarchy on merchant cards

Merchant cards were redesigned to lead with the decision-relevant information: cuisine type, delivery time, rating, promo. Less noise, faster scanning, higher click-through to restaurant pages.

Results
Design Approach

Search is a journey, not a single step.

We broke the experience into four sub-experiences. Each step carries search context forward — so the user never loses their intent as they move through the flow.

01Pre-Search

Predictive suggestions, recent restaurant cards, and contextual chips — before the user types a single character.

02During Search

Query understanding and intent classification in real-time. The suggestion list adapts to whether the user is typing a dish, brand, or cuisine.

03Results

Intent-matched result layouts: dish results within restaurant context, brand hubs, redesigned merchant cards with better information hierarchy.

04Within Restaurant

Search context persists into the restaurant menu — users who searched for 'gado-gado' land on the relevant menu section, not the top.